TURNSTYLE: AMAZON’S FIRE TV: BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE

 ON WEDNESDAY, APR. 2ND

Slowly but surely Jeff Bezos is taking over the media.

Today marked the announcement of the anticipated set-top box from Amazon, dubbed the Fire TV. As expected this new device will compete with the Roku and Apple TV devices, settling in at $99.

For video services Fire TV will support not only Amazon Instant Video but Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, Vimeo, the NBA and MLB.tv, all of which are pretty much platform agnostic at this point. Until today Amazon Instant Video was effectively platform agnostic as well, appearing on the Roku as well as Playstation and Xbox consoles. One has to wonder how long those deals will hold up, now that Amazon is making competing hardware. Especially hardware that plays video games.

For an additional $39.99 a game controller can be added to the mix, which opens turns the device into a game console featuring Android based games. Amazon promises thousands of games by next month.

That, of course, translates into port upon port of mobile phone games to the big screen. They promise an average price of just $1.85 for games. These numbers are almost certainly based on the current mobile marketplace. For gamers concerned with quality, there probably couldn’t be worse news.

(Read why the race to the bottom in games and media sucks for consumers after the jump.)

 

We’ve seen what the race to the bottom has done to the games market for the past decade. It leads to things like the Threes/2048 débâcle where a rip-off of a highly designed game is cranked out over a weekend and eclipses the original. The developers of Threes get to scrape together an existence while their work is exploited by those with questionable ethics. Could theThrees developers headed the clones off at the pass by making their game free-to-play with ads? Just 99 cents on debut?

We’ll never know.

There’s a corollary over in the indie TV space, otherwise known as YouTube.

There we’ve seen the rise of multi-channel networks as creators banded together (Maker Studios) and advertising innovators gathered a roster of stars (Fullscreen). Both flavors of MCNs seek to solve the same problem: the majority of indies can’t go it alone.

At first the MCN model looked like it was going to be the middle ground between lone wolves and Big Media, but that hope is quickly being extinguished. Disney’s purchase of Maker Studios for half a billion (more if they hit performance targets) was the tombstone for the middle path. The ad revenue split for YouTubers is notoriously bad, which incentivizes lowest common denominator programming.

Amazon, in the meantime, has become the New Octopus. Not content with holding the high ground in the publishing industry, Bezos and company have slowly been colonizing Hollywood. Their beachhead was the Internet Movie Database, of all things. Yes, Amazon owns the mirror with which Hollywood looks at itself. There’s a segment of actors who are obsessed enough with their StarMeter rankings that they pay people to raise them, much in the same way people buy Twitter followers.

There’s practical uses of IMDB as well. A Pro account yields you all kinds of useful information like agency and production company phone numbers. It isn’t exactly Hollywood’s White Pages, but that’s not too far off the mark.

To IMDB the Amazon empire added Amazon Studios, which had a first-look deal with Warner Bros. for crowdsourced development. That venture didn’t yield any film hits, but Amazon uses the same brand for their Amazon Original series, like Alpha House and Betas. (Up next on the development slate: Delta DogsKappa Kops, and Omega Moo.)

Once upon a time Congress stepped in to stop Hollywood from owning every piece of the production and distribution chain. That’s why the Fox and Paramount theaters in your home town are more likely to host concerts than they are to show X-Men: Days of Future Past or Noah. Soon Amazon will have a much better scenario than that: they will publish books directly to your Kindle, stream TV shows they produce to every device you own, and deliver games to your TV. Amazon Payments is a de facto bank for services like Kickstarter, and much of the web runs on Amazon Web Services.

Amazon is, in essence, too big to fail.

From a certain point of view the Fire TV is the first “new generation” multimedia device. While the recently released game consoles pack a lot of computational power, Amazon has run the other way and is doing what it does best: delivering content on the cheap. This gives them a huge first mover advantage as Google and Apple finalize their own new generation plans.

Microsoft long dreamed of using the Xbox as a trojan horse for owning the living room. While they were building that brand Bezos and company turned themselves into ubiquitous middle men between content creators and consumers. At every step of the way they have catered to the whims of the later, the former having a status little better than the temp workers who fulfill shipping orders in Amazon’s vast warehouses.

What’s distressing about the race to the bottom is that it favors the crappy status quo we already have in media. When new platforms  emerge there is this brief, shining moment when discovery is possible. A few gems appear, some reputations get forged, and the audience is open to experimentation. Those values don’t seem to be anywhere in Amazon’s DNA. It is not a creative force. Amazon is FedEx with an attitude: a shipping company that thinks it knows best.

It would be one thing if Amazon contented itself with being an infrastructure company, but their forays into media production and game development–not to mention Bezos’ personal purchase of The Washington Post–betray far vaster ambitions. What is strange about all this is that the old media guard seem to be content to let Amazon grow and grow. Perhaps they are waiting for a showdown between Amazon, Comcast, and Google with the giants slugging it out until their empires crumble under their own weight.

 •  •  •  •  •

Original Link: http://turnstylenews.com/2014/04/02/amazons-fire-tv-burning-down-the-house/

TECH CRUNCH:

After a brief stint without a home, Popcorn Time is back online at Popcorn-time.tv. I give it two weeks until the site is pulled and it pops up somewhere else. Meanwhile the installer is actively traded on torrent sites and back on GitHub, showing that a program can exist, but perhaps not thrive, without a flashy front-end website.

This cycle of being a virtual rolling stone is the result of the shady nature of the program. Popcorn Time is without question the easiest way to watch pirated, and illegal content. By constantly moving, the program is staying somewhat hidden in the belly of the Internet — that is, until we shoot the new address to the masses. Sorry ’bout that.

Original Link: http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/03/popcorn-time-has-a-new-home/

VARIETY: Amazon Unveils Fire TV, Video-Streaming and Gaming Set-Top for TVs

APRIL 2, 2014 | 08:30AM PT

Amazon.com launched an Internet video-streaming and gaming device – the $99 Fire TV – as the e-retailing giant looks to grab a spot in the living room to promote its own content services and get an edge on rivals including Apple and Netflix.

As expected, Fire TV will stream Amazon’s Instant Video and Prime Instant Video, the unlimited movie and TV service available through its free-shipping program. It will also provide access to Netflix, Hulu Plus, YouTube and other video services including WatchESPN, Vevo, Pandora and Showtime Anytime, as well as games, apps and photos.

Peter Larsen, head of Amazon’s Kindle division, said the new device will provide better search, faster performance and access to more content services than current options on the market like Apple TV, Google’s Chromecast and Roku boxes. All told, Fire TV has three times the performance of each of those devices, he claimed.

“This is a powerful device,” Larsen said, at the company’s launch event today in New York. “It’s the best way to watch Netflix… This isn’t a closed ecosystem.”

The device goes on sale today. Eligible customers will get a free 30-day trial of Amazon Prime — which the company just hiked 25%, to $99 per year — when they purchase a Fire TV. Also key: Fire TV will ship preregistered with customers’ Amazon account, so they can start buying TV shows or movies, or start streaming Prime Instant Video, right away.

The square (4.5-by-4.5-inch) device is 0.7-inch high, so it fits comfortably anywhere in an entertainment center or behind a TV, Larsen said. The Android-based box supports 1080p video, and sports a quad-core processor, a dedicated graphics processing unit and 2 gigabytes of memory. The device includes a Bluetooth-enabled remote control, and has a predictive-analysis feature dubbed “ASAP” to guess what TV show or movie title a user will watch next. Fire TV also supports voice-recognition to search for content.

Larsen said Amazon has invested “hundreds of millions of dollars” in content since 2011, which includes several exclusive pacts for TV shows including Fox’s “24,” CBS’s “Under the Dome” and kids’ far from Nickelodeon. He also touted Amazon Studios’ original series, including John Goodman-starrer “Alpha House,” and the just-greenlit “The After” from Chris Carter and dramedy “Mozart in the Jungle.”

Other video apps available on Fire TV include Time Warner’s Flixster, Vimeo, Bloomberg TV, Sony’s Crackle, Red Bull TV, Qello Concerts and RealNetworks’ RealPlayer Cloud. HBO Go is currently absent from the lineup. Amazon said additional services including WWE Network, MLB.TV, Watch Disney Channel, Watch ABC and Twitch will be coming soon.

SEE ALSO: Amazon Greenlights 6 Series, Including Chris Carter’s ‘The After,’ and Renews ‘Alpha House’

Amazon Fire TV is also a game machine. The device has an optional $39.99 game controller, and next month Amazon will offer thousands of games on the box, including “Minecraft,” “Monsters University,” “The Game of Life,” “The Walking Dead,” “NBA2K14,” “Asphalt 8: Airborne” and “Despicable Me: Minion Rush.” The company said it has deals to bring games from Disney, EA, Gameloft, Ubisoft, Sega, Telltale and others to the device. The average price of a paid game will be $1.85, and there will be more than 1,000 games that are free to play.

In addition, Amazon Game Studios is developing games from the ground up for Fire TV. Execs showed a demo of “Sev Zero,” a first-person shooter set in outer space. It’s available for $6.99 (free with purchase of the Fire game controller).

Next month, Amazon will add the ability to stream music purchased from the e-retailer with lyrics synchronized on the TV screen. FreeTime, a feature Amazon developed for the Kindle tablets to manage the content kids can access on tablets, will also come to Fire TV to let parents “white-list” content on the set-top box.

Fire TV includes features that work with Kindle tablets, too. A mirroring feature displays what’s on a Kindle Fire HDX on TV. A “fling” icon on the tablet sends video or audio to the big screen, and the X-Ray feature, powered by IMDb, lets users access in-scene info on characters, trivia, music and more.

The Amazon box will compete primarily with the $99 Apple TV, the $35 Chromecast and Roku (whose devices range from $50-$100). Those three devices each provide access to Netflix, YouTube, Hulu Plus and HBO Go; Amazon’s video services are currently only on Roku. It’s also positioned as a gaming device to challenge Xbox and PlayStation.

But with the connected-TV hardware play, Amazon also is aiming to give itself real estate on big-screen HDTVs to feature its media services. The company’s chief competitor in electronic sell-through is Apple, and Amazon is spending heavily to bring original and exclusive series to challenge SVOD leader Netflix.

The Apple TV business generated more than $1 billion in revenue last year, according to CEO Tim Cook. That figure includes both hardware sales and content sold through the boxes.

At this point, there’s a big opportunity for Amazon to carve out share in the fast-growing market. About 14% of U.S. broadband households had a streaming-video media device like a Roku or Apple TV in 2013, according to Parks Associates. Overall, the research firm projects sales of connected-TV devices, including streaming players, smart TVs, videogame consoles and other products, to reach 330 million annually by 2017, nearly double units shipped in 2013.

Amazon’s launch of Fire TV come after its successful foray into the tablet space with the Kindle, which provides access to video, books, songs, apps and other content purchased through the e-commerce portal. The company sold an estimated $4.5 billion worth of Kindle e-readers and tablets in 2013 and is projected to hit $5 billion in Kindle device sales this year, according to Morgan Stanley.

The e-retailer’s ad campaign for Fire TV will feature thesp Gary Busey. Amazon screened a clip showing a wild-eyed Busey screaming at a Roku screen, “Find Gary Busey!” — then speaking calmly into the Fire TV’s remote to pull up search results with movies he’s appeared in. (Watch the clip here.)

Reports of Amazon’s project to create a set-top surfaced last year. It reportedly had been shooting to launch a connected-TV device in late 2013, but evidently missed the window on the holiday-shopping season.

Amazon held the announcement at Manhattan’s Milk Studios, replete with a living-room set centered around a gigantic central HDTV and flanked by two other screens. Event had a movie theme with posters lining the walls and Amazon doled out popcorn and candy to attendees.

 

Original Link: http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/amazon-unveils-fire-tv-video-streaming-set-top-for-tvs-1201151240/

NY TIMES: Barely Keeping Up in TV’s New Golden Age

Not long ago, a friend at work told me I absolutely, positively must watch “Broad City” on Comedy Central, saying it was a slacker-infused hilarity.

My reaction? Oh no, not another one.

The vast wasteland of television has been replaced by an excess of excellence that is fundamentally altering my media diet and threatening to consume my waking life in the process. I am not alone. Even as alternatives proliferate and people cut the cord, they are continuing to spend ever more time in front of the TV without a trace of embarrassment.

I was never one of those snobby people who would claim to not own a television when the subject came up, but I was generally more a reader than a watcher. That was before the explosion in quality television tipped me over into a viewing frenzy.

Something tangible, and technical, is at work. The addition of ancillary devices onto what had been a dumb box has made us the programming masters of our own universes. Including the cable box — with its video on demand and digital video recorder — and Apple TV, Chromecast, PlayStation, Roku, Wii and Xbox, that universe is constantly expanding. Time-shifting allows not just greater flexibility, but increased consumption. According to Nielsen, Americans watched almost 15 hours of time-shifted television a month in 2013, two more hours a month than the year before.

Photo

Kevin Spacey on “House of Cards.” TV shows can now follow viewers wherever they travel and whenever they have spare time. CreditNathaniel Bell for Netflix

And what a feast. Right now, I am on the second episode of Season 2 of “House of Cards” (Netflix), have caught up on “Girls” (HBO) and am reveling in every episode of “Justified” (FX). I may be a little behind on “The Walking Dead” (AMC) and “Nashville” (ABC) and have just started “The Americans” (FX), but I am pretty much in step with comedies like “Modern Family” (ABC) and “Archer” (FX) and like everyone one else I know, dying to see how “True Detective” (HBO) ends. Oh, and the fourth season of “Game of Thrones” (HBO) starts next month.

Whew. Never mind being able to hold all these serials simultaneously in my head, how can there possibly be room for anything else? So far, the biggest losers in this fight for mind share are not my employer or loved ones, but other forms of media.

My once beloved magazines sit in a forlorn pile, patiently waiting for their turn in front of my eyes. Television now meets many of the needs that pile previously satisfied. I have yet to read the big heave on Amazon in The New Yorker, or the feature on the pathology of contemporary fraternities in the March issue of The Atlantic, and while I have an unhealthy love of street food, I haven’t cracked the spine on Lucky Peach’s survey of the same. Ditto for what looks like an amazing first-person account in Mother Jones from the young Americans who were kidnapped in Iran in 2009. I am a huge fan of the resurgent trade magazines like Adweek and The Hollywood Reporter, but watching the products they describe usually wins out over reading about them.

Magazines in general had a tough year, with newsstand sales down over 11 percent, John Harrington, an industry analyst who tracks circulation, said.

And then there are books. I have a hierarchy: books I’d like to read, books I should read, books I should read by friends of mine and books I should read by friends of mine whom I am likely to bump into. They all remain on standby. That tablets now contain all manner of brilliant stories that happen to be told in video, not print, may be partly why e-book salesleveled out last year. After a day of online reading that has me bathed in the information stream, when I have a little me-time, I mostly want to hit a few buttons on one of my three remotes — cable, Apple, Roku — and watch the splendors unfurl.

It used to be that I could at least use travel time to catch up on reading, but now airplanes have become mediated, wired spaces as well. And even when I get to a hotel or a vacation spot, my media library comes with me. This summer, I used a skinny little DSL connection at my cabin in the woods to watch “The Newsroom” on HBO Go.

In the past, great shows, entire seasons of them, used to go whooshing past me. Now they are always there, waiting for me to hit play. Like my dog, they are friendly and tend to follow me around seeking my attention.

It means people like me end up going to fewer movies. Sitting at home with a big, throbbing stack of quality entertainment and a big old screen on which to view it, am I really going to spend $12 to sit by a stranger, watch more commercials than I do at home — you cannot skip them in the movie theater — and hope that what I see on screen was worth getting in a cold car and competing for parking and seating?

All the new windows for content have created an in-migration of creative interest. David Fincher, one of Hollywood’s most coveted directors, followed up producing “House of Cards” by signing on to make a series for HBO called “Utopia.” Guillermo del Toro, a big-deal director, has created a series called “The Strain” for FX. Oliver Stone spent a great deal of time making a history program on Showtime and now word comes that Robert Redford is doing documentaries for CNN.

Even at the Oscars, Hollywood’s biggest night, TV seemed like the cool hipster at the party. Ellen DeGeneres’s just-folks delivery treated incandescent celebrities as if they were regular people who like eating pizza and being on television. The winner of the award for best actor, Matthew McConaughey, has also been making a big splash on TV with “True Detective.”

At a panel about television over the weekend at the South by Southwestconference in Austin, Tex., that I moderated, Kathleen McCaffrey of HBO said that television entered people’s lives by letting go of procedurals about doctors and lawyers and telling stories about authentic, frequently flawed people.

“So much of the conversation comes from strong serialized dramas about people’s lives and how they live them,” she said.

The growing intellectual currency of television has altered the cultural conversation in fundamental ways. Water cooler chatter is now a high-minded pursuit, not just a way to pass the time at work. The three-camera sitcom with a laugh track has been replaced by television shows that are much more like books — intricate narratives full of text, subtext and clues.

On the sidelines of the children’s soccer game, or at dinner with friends, you can set your watch on how long it takes before everyone finds a show in common. In the short span of five years, table talk has shifted, at least among the people I socialize with, from books and movies to television. The idiot box gained heft and intellectual credibility to the point where you seem dumb if you are not watching it.

All these riches induce pleasure, but no small amount of guilt as well. Am I a bad person because I missed “Top of the Lake” on the Sundance channel?

Television’s golden age is also a gilded cage, an always-on ecosystem of immense riches that leaves me feeling less like the master of my own universe, and more as if I am surrounded.

SLATE: Listen to Danah Boyd discuss her new book, It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens,

“Live at Politics & Prose” is a co-production of Slate Radio and Politics & Prose bookstore in Washington, D.C. You can subscribe for free through iTunes or with our RSS Feed to catch all upcoming episodes.

You’ll find other episodes of the program in our archives. You can also find out about attending future readings at the Politics & Prose event calendar page. Please send any feedback about the show to podcasts@slate.com.

 

Andy Bowers is the executive producer of Slate’s podcasts. Follow him on Twitter.

LIFE HACKER: TV Streaming Head-to-Head: Netflix vs Hulu vs Amazon Prime

One of the more annoying things about Netflix, Hulu Plus, and Amazon’s television streaming libraries is the vast difference between the selection available. It would be almost impossible to get a thorough idea of who has the better library without searching for hundreds of TV shows on each service and comparing them manually. So we did just that.P

We all have our own impression of what kind of selection different companies have, but we wanted to get a clearer picture. To do that, we searched for 250 shows on Netflix, Hulu Plus, and Amazon Prime to see who has the best selection available for their respective paid subscription services. Just for kicks, we also threw in Amazon, iTunes, and Google Play’s selection of shows you can buy as well.P

MethodologyP

Getting a complete representation of everything that the various streaming services have to offer would be an undertaking too huge and too dense to be useful. In order to get a useful glimpse into the different libraries, here’s what we did:P

  • We counted IMDb’s top 250 TV shows by MOVIEmeter rank. IMDb ranks movies and TV shows based on a scale called MOVIEmeter, which measures how much people are searching for and interacting with certain titles (regardless of ratings, reviews, or recency). The full list can be found here. We gathered the top 250 shows according to this list to represent the shows most people are interested in, irrespective of demographic.P
  • We included partial seasons in the count. Some shows are currently airing and new episodes arrive regularly. Other services may get licenses to show half of a season. If a service has six full seasons and part of the seventh season available, we counted it as seven seasons. We did not count “best of” episode packs or holiday specials where applicable.P
  • We gave Hulu Plus special “Recent Episode” designations. While Hulu Plus offers a similar service to Netflix and Amazon Prime, it’s also the only service surveyed that offers to carry a rotating collection of the last few episodes of a show, or the entire recent season. These were counted as either the “Recent Season” or “Recent Episodes” designation, depending on the licensing scheme.P
  • We did not count shows hosted on network sites. Most networks including CBS, HGTV, Adult Swim, Fox, AMC, HBO, Showtime, and dozens more offer full episodes of shows on their own web sites (sometimes for a fee). While Hulu is pretty good at finding out if episodes are available on these sites, we did not include that availability in this analysis.P
  • We only looked at US availability. Looking at availability across different services is already pretty complicated, but accounting for differences in international licensing is a mess. Our data only includes US availability, but you may be able to use apps like Hola Unblocker to see content that’s available in countries outside your own.P

With this in mind, here’s what we found:P

TV Streaming Head-to-Head: Netflix vs Hulu vs Amazon Prime12SEXPAND

While we collected far more than just 25 shows, unfortunately showing them all would create a graphic that’s just a little bit too big to be useful. The curious, however, can check out the raw data here. Keep in mind, though, that these libraries change all the time. This data was collected on the weekend of February 22 and 23rd, but it could have changed by the time you read this.P

ConclusionsP

With the data collected, we can learn a few things about how the different services stack up.P

Netflix is the Undisputed TV Streaming KingP

Setting aside that Netflix is breaking new ground and winning awards with its streaming-only shows like House of Cards, Netflix has more than twice as many shows available to stream as Amazon Prime (122 shows vs 58 out of 250). Not only did Netflix have more than Amazon, it had just shy of half of all the shows surveyed (48.8%). So, unless you’re looking for something obscure or extremely old, you’ve got roughly a coin-flip’s chance of finding it on Netflix. P

On top of that, it has more shows that Hulu Plus and Amazon don’t carry. Netflix had 54 exclusive shows (among streaming services surveyed) versus only 17 that were exclusive to Amazon. This includes big-name shows like Breaking Bad or The Walking Dead, which you can purchase on Amazon, but not stream with a Prime subscription. In other words, even if you already pay for Prime, a Netflix subscription might be worth it.P

Hulu Corners the Market on New ContentP

The one thing Netflix and Amazon both falter at is recent shows. There’s almost always a several month long delay between a season wrapping up and its arrival on streaming services. This is where Hulu Plus picks up the slack. Hulu Plus had 92 of the 250 shows surveyed. However, only 40 of them included backlogs of older seasons. 52 of the shows Hulu Plus carried were either the most recent season or a rotating set of the most recent few episodes of a show. In other words, you can use Netflix to catch up on the first four seasons, but for the fifth season that’s currently airing on TV? Hit up Hulu Plus.P

It’s also worth pointing out that, while there are a ton of shows Hulu Plus does not carry natively (only 36.8% of the shows we checked were on Hulu Plus at all), the service is pretty good at indexing other sites that also have full episodes. It won’t redirect you to direct competitors like Netflix, but it can act as a search engine for places like CBS, AMC, or HBO that have episodes available on their own sites or services. At least in that sense, Hulu is worth checking out when you want to find shows. Just keep in mind that once you leave Hulu, you’re at the mercy of the content providers themselves. Hulu returning results for HBO shows doesn’t mean that you can play them on a device that supports Hulu. That’s just Hulu’s way of helping you find where to look next.3P

Streaming Selection Still Doesn’t Hold a Candle to Purchasing ShowsP

While the bulk of this survey was aimed at comparing streaming libraries, we’d be remiss if we didn’t look at content you can buy as well. Amazon, Google Play, and iTunes all allow users to buy individual episodes or whole seasons of television shows and get unlimited access to them. Google’s selection included 170 of the 250 shows or 68% of all shows we checked. Amazon and iTunes, however, had a full 226 out of 250 or 90.4% of surveyed shows available for purchase.P

The implication of this finding is pretty clear: if you want to watch TV shows on the internet, most content providers will be happy to oblige. For a price. Now, some of us could probably refinance a home with the amount of cash we might spend trying to buy seasons for all the shows we watch, but if you’re really desperate to watch a show and it’s not available anywhere else, there is the option. At the very least, all three services are pretty good about allowing you to buy new episodes as they come out. So, there’s that.P

At the end of the day, this is just a glimpse into the average use case. I can think of a handful of shows I like to watch that weren’t even high enough on the IMDb list (MST3K anyone?). Even if Netflix has Amazon beat in the numbers, you might have all you need with Amazon. The best thing you can do is grab your five or ten favorite shows and check them out for yourself.

 

Original Link: http://lifehacker.com/tv-streaming-head-to-head-netflix-vs-hulu-vs-amazon-pr-1536006625

DEADLINE: Netflix CFO Says Comcast Deal Was Needed To Improve Subscriber Experience

By  | Monday March 3, 2014 @ 5:57pm ESTTags: ComcastNetflix

Netflix had to make its potentially game-changing new deal to pay Comcast for improved service over its broadband lines because “there were some choke points around peak usage times,” the streaming service’s CFO David Wells said today at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference. That should ease now that the agreement —  which eliminates intermediaries handling Netflix traffic to Comcast — will “shore up the long term subscriber experience.” Some investors are concerned that the arrangement might become costly. But Wells says not to worry: the additional outlays won’t change its forecast for fatter profit margins in its U.S. streaming business this year. The amount Netflix will pay Comcast “was incremental, but not to the point where we’re changing that.” Nor is he concerned that other broadband providers will now insist on large payments to improve Netflix transmissions. Others “could” ask for a similar deal, and the company is “somewhat caught in the middle” because it wants to ensure “a long term subscriber experience” that will require more bandwidth as it offers more HD and, soon, 4K transmissions. Still, “not all ISPs are created equal,” Wells says, and “we’re not going to be interested in doing anything that will meaningfully change the economics.”

The CFO reaffirmed the company’s interest in offering different tiers of service for different prices. “We’re not in a hurry,” he says. Netflix wants to offer choices because “one size does not fit all from a price standpoint.” But current users’ plans likely will be grandfathered in. That’s “a lesson learned from 2011″ when Netflix infuritated customers by separating its streaming and DVD rental services, requiring those who still wanted both to pay a lot more.

On the programming front, Wells says that the number of original series will grow. “It would be great to get to one to two every month.”

Original Link: http://www.deadline.com/2014/03/netflix-cfo-says-comcast-deal-was-needed-to-improve-subscriber-experience/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook